<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spy and Kong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikegerber.com/2006/12/23/spy-and-kong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikegerber.com/2006/12/23/spy-and-kong/</link>
	<description>Check out new content at Yalerecord.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 06:47:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.mikegerber.com/2006/12/23/spy-and-kong/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 09:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikegerber.com/wordpress/?p=731#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike, great comments as always. It&#039;s like you should be writing my blog sometimes. I just wanted to point out that I did make the observation that Mad has survived because it has a constant refueling resource - kids - who aren&#039;t up on Mad&#039;s voice. They are outside of everything, so Mad always has a chance to reach them (though less and less now - in the world of Nickelodeon).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have to admit one of the reasons why I focused on Mad was because it was mentioned in the book and it didn&#039;t entirely jibe to me. I would have asked about Private Eye, but sadly, I&#039;ve never read a copy of it.  I actually know a husband of a good friend who is a collector of them, so I really have no excuse other than my media diet is incredibly full.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike, great comments as always. It&#39;s like you should be writing my blog sometimes. I just wanted to point out that I did make the observation that Mad has survived because it has a constant refueling resource &#8211; kids &#8211; who aren&#39;t up on Mad&#39;s voice. They are outside of everything, so Mad always has a chance to reach them (though less and less now &#8211; in the world of Nickelodeon).</p>
<p>I have to admit one of the reasons why I focused on Mad was because it was mentioned in the book and it didn&#39;t entirely jibe to me. I would have asked about Private Eye, but sadly, I&#39;ve never read a copy of it.  I actually know a husband of a good friend who is a collector of them, so I really have no excuse other than my media diet is incredibly full.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

